Blake, I do not understand this expression below (ts7+tn8)/2+tphoton. Why is it not (ts7+tn7)/2-tphoton? I assume the subscript mismatch is a typo -- it says (ts8+tn8)/2+tphoton on the wiki page -- but it puzzles me why you are adding instead of subtracting the tagger time. Richard Blake Leverington wrote: > Hi David, > > I redid similar plots to what you did on April 4th but now using the > tagger as a reference time( i.e (ts7+tn8)/2 + tphoton ) and things > look much better. However... :) ...I can clearly see 4 bumps that I am > not sure where they are coming from. I sort of see gaps in the > tn8+tphoton:Ephoton spectra as if we're missing the t-counter there or > something. > > You can see the results here: > http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/software/wiki/index.php/BCal_Beam_Test_Plots%2C_April_6%2C_2007 > > > -Blake > > > > >
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature