Re: 4 (5?) bumps but a definite improvement

[Simon Taylor <staylor@jlab.org>]

Hi, Blake.

I would suggest cutting those regions out.  They have nothing to do with
the BCAL timing response.

Simon

On Sun, 8 Apr 2007, Blake Leverington wrote:

> Hi Simon,
>
> Ok. From what I've seen in bcal_mon histograms that makes sense to me.
> Now how do we deal with that? Just cut those regions out? I suppose I
> might have to.
>
> -Blake
>
> Simon Taylor wrote:
> > Hi, all.
> >
> > I think the bump near Egamma=530 MeV corresponds to the transition between
> > the two sizes of T-counters at T-counters 19-20.
> >
> > Simon
> >
> > On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Blake Leverington wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hi David,
> >>
> >> I redid similar plots to what you did on April 4th but now using the
> >> tagger as a reference time( i.e (ts7+tn8)/2 + tphoton ) and things look
> >> much better. However... :) ...I can clearly see 4 bumps that I am not
> >> sure where they are coming from. I sort of see gaps in the
> >> tn8+tphoton:Ephoton spectra as if we're missing the t-counter there or
> >> something.
> >>
> >> You can see the results here:
> >> http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/software/wiki/index.php/BCal_Beam_Test_Plots%2C_April_6%2C_2007
> >>
> >> -Blake
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>