Re: Yesterday's Minutes

[Blake Leverington <leverinb@uregina.ca>]

Hi Richard,

I think that was a type-o as nothing has been subtracted from floor term 
when the time difference resolution is measured. The tagger contribution 
was only subtracted when taking the sum of the two ends because the 
tagger was used as a reference time.

-Blake

Richard Jones wrote:
> from Matt's minutes of May 8 calorimetry meeting,
>>
>>
>>         Time Difference
>>
>> Similar plots of the end to end time difference indicated statistical 
>> (floor) terms of 81 (21) ps, where again, the floor term as been 
>> compensated for the estimated 113 ps tagger/trigger resolution. 
> It makes no sense to subtract the tagger/trigger resolution here 
> because these are relative times between the two ends of the BCal.  
> The tagger/trigger time disappears in the difference.  I suggest that 
> the results should simply show the uncorrected floor term.  However I 
> am not going to correct the minutes if what is stated there is 
> actually what was presented.  Do you want comments added to the 
> minutes as annotations?
>
> Richard J.