[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: comparing E852 and GlueX - eta pio



I agree - I wrote this little note after answering some issues
Elke raised in comparing GlueX with E852 performance.   It
should not go into the upcoming review but might be good to
add this to the overall Design Report later.

Cheers
Alex

At 2:01 PM -0400 3/16/08, Curtis A. Meyer wrote:
>That is a really nice set of plots. After the tracking review I want to
>revisit the summary document with both charged and photons
>in it. This should be included in that document.
>
>   cheers - Curtis
>On Sun March 16 2008, Alex Dzierba wrote:
>>  This is something I wish I had done for the calorimetry review - comparing
>>  the E852 vs GlueX acceptance performance for the eta pio reaction.
>>
>>  Alex
>
>
>
>--
>Professor Curtis A. Meyer        Department of Physics
>Phone:  (412) 268-2745          Carnegie Mellon University
>Fax:    (412) 681-0648            Pittsburgh PA 15213-3890
>cmeyer@ernest.phys.cmu.edu  http://www.curtismeyer.com/


-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Alex R. Dzierba
Chancellor's Professor of Physics (Emeritus)
Department of Physics / Indiana U / Bloomington IN 47405 / 812-855-9421
JLab Visiting Fellow
Jefferson Lab / 12000 Jefferson Ave / Newport News, VA 23606 / 757-269-7577
Home Phone: 812-825-4063  Cell:  812-327-1881  Fax: 866-541-1263
http://www.dzre.com/alex
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~