Re: 1006 steel

["Guangliang Yang" <y.guangliang@physics.gla.ac.uk>]

Dear Jim,

    The nominal current stated in the tagger specification is for operating 
the tagger at 1.8 T.   1.7 T is a little bit low even for 1010 steel. Please 
find attached BH table for 1006 steel. Hope this will help.

Cheers

Yang









----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Stewart" <jstewart@jlab.org>
To: "Guangliang Yang" <y.guangliang@physics.gla.ac.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 1:57 PM
Subject: 1006 steel


> Hello Yang
>
> With Floyd's help I got ANSYS to model the magnet. However ANSYS only has 
> 1010 steel. The field I get now is 1.7T for the nominal current which is 
> significantly larger than what you have. The first thing I wanted to be 
> sure of is that the difference is not coming from the steel. Could you 
> send me the B-H curve you are using in TOSCA? I would like to put this in 
> ANSYS and see what happens. If this does not help then I will refine the 
> mesh more.
>
> ANSYS seems to be relatively easy to put in the geometry but there seems 
> to be no easy way to get the data out. This drawback will really limit its 
> usefulness unless we find a way to overcome it.
>
> Jim
>
>

toscadefault.bh