[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: specification for the uniform field region
Thanks, Jim, for correcting it ... I just looked at your drawing and
compared to previous mails, asking myself why requiring a homogeneity
better than 'perfect': 3x10^-4 is great! Now we have some real
quantification - not only our Mainz-based estimates as in earlier
versions.
Thanks
Franz
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jim Stewart wrote:
>
> Sorry it should read 3 parts in 10,000 not 2 parts in 10,000. Jim
>
>
> Jim Stewart wrote:
>> Hello Everyone
>>
>> I have attached a sketch for what I propose for the uniform field region to
>> use in the specification
>> for the tagger magnet. The required field uniformity would be 2 parts in
>> 10,000 for any 2 points in
>> the hatched area less than 100mm apart and 1% over the whole hatched area.
>> I would also like to
>> require the uniformity +/- 2mm above and below the horizontal plane.
>>
>> Please let me know what you think?
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
>
===============================================================
Franz J. Klein, Associate Professor
CUA, Department of Physics
Washington, DC 20064
office: Hannan Hall 206 phone: 202-319-6190
or: Jefferson Lab,CC F-243 phone: 757-269-6671
---------------------------------------------------------------