[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: comparing E852 and GlueX - eta pio

To: Alex Dzierba <dzierba@indiana.edu>
Subject: Re: comparing E852 and GlueX - eta pio
From: "Curtis A. Meyer" <cmeyer@ernest.phys.cmu.edu>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:01:51 -0400
Cc: halld-cal@jlab.org, halld-tracking-hw@jlab.org
In-Reply-To: <a06240807c4030300cf38@[192.168.1.103]>
Organization: Carnegie Mellon University
References: <a06240807c4030300cf38@[192.168.1.103]>
Reply-To: "Curtis A. Meyer" <cmeyer@ernest.phys.cmu.edu>
Sender: owner-halld-tracking-hw@jlab.org
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6

That is a really nice set of plots. After the tracking review I want to
revisit the summary document with both charged and photons 
in it. This should be included in that document.

  cheers - Curtis
On Sun March 16 2008, Alex Dzierba wrote:
> This is something I wish I had done for the calorimetry review - comparing
> the E852 vs GlueX acceptance performance for the eta pio reaction.
> 
> Alex



-- 
Professor Curtis A. Meyer        Department of Physics
Phone:  (412) 268-2745          Carnegie Mellon University
Fax:    (412) 681-0648            Pittsburgh PA 15213-3890
cmeyer@ernest.phys.cmu.edu  http://www.curtismeyer.com/

Prev by Date: Re: Comparison of March2007 and March2008 tracking resolution
Next by Date: Tracking Detector Tests & Status
Prev by thread: Re: Comparison of March2007 and March2008 tracking resolution
Next by thread: Tracking Detector Tests & Status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread