Re: Calorimetry Meeting (fwd from Curtis)

[Elton Smith <elton@jlab.org>]

On Tue May 1 2007 07:47, Curtis A. Meyer wrote:
> Thanks Alex -
>
>      this is indeed a very important issue, thanks for updating your
> document to reflect to different ranges. It might we worth adding the
> meanings of A-G to the caption of Figure 5. Similarly, it is probably
> worth noting in the captions that Figures 6 and 7 are case "G" in Figure
> 5.
>
>     In addition, while these are  imporant reactions, (gamma p -> p pi0 pi0 and
> p pi0 eta), they are in the class of what I call "hard to do", with phi->K+K-
> being the worst example. Having someone repeat your studies with other
> likely hybrid reactions would also be important.
>
>     Finally, it is crucial that we undertand this effect well in our MonteCarlo.
> As such, discsusions in the software meeting are a very good idea.
>
>     cheers - Curtis
> On Tue May 1 2007 06:39, Alex Dzierba wrote:
> > The attached is an updated version of the note I posted to this group
> > on Friday.  I added a section (clearly marked) on the effect of varying
> > the angular hole between BCAL and FCAL from 1 degree to 4 degrees in
> > 1 degree steps.  - Alex
>

-- 
Professor Curtis A. Meyer        Department of Physics
Phone:  (412) 268-2745          Carnegie Mellon University
Fax:    (412) 681-0648            Pittsburgh PA 15213-3890
cmeyer@ernest.phys.cmu.edu  http://www.curtismeyer.com/