[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GlueX] Cable lengths

To: beni zihlmann <bzihlman@indiana.edu>
Subject: Re: [GlueX] Cable lengths
From: Tim Whitlatch <whitey@jlab.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:29:38 -0500
CC: Matthew Shepherd <mashephe@indiana.edu>, halld-cal@jlab.org
In-Reply-To: <47B4B0BD.3010502@indiana.edu>
References: <47B4AFA8.7030706@jlab.org> <47B4B0BD.3010502@indiana.edu>
Reply-To: Tim Whitlatch <whitey@jlab.org>
Sender: owner-halld-cal@jlab.org
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)

Hi Beni

We can probably take of the slack somewhere. The shorter cables will not 
help with losses? I guess it is not a problem.

Tim

beni zihlmann wrote:
> Hi Tim,
> the cable length for the FCAL are in the list with 36 feet 1in.
> 2500 cables are already fabricated all with a length of 50 feet.
> I hope that poses no problem.
>
> cheers,
> Beni
>
> Tim Whitlatch wrote:
>> Chuck has looked at maximum cable lengths for the signal cables for 
>> each detector with the new rack layout. This includes an additional 
>> 2M loop. It is posted on the wiki under Engineering.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>        Tim
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GlueX mailing list
>> GlueX@dustbunny.physics.indiana.edu
>> http://dustbunny.physics.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/gluex
>>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [GlueX] Cable lengths
  - From: Elke-Caroline Aschenauer <elke@jlab.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Calorimeter Review and Monitoring/Calibration
Next by Date: Re: [GlueX] Cable lengths
Prev by thread: new SiPM page
Next by thread: Re: [GlueX] Cable lengths
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread