[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Preamp tests
Hall D Electronics:
Hi Yves,
I forgot to mention on my previous email, and in reference to your
observations, that the preamp input has a bias voltage present (~ a few
100 mV) at the input when powered. This bias is provided inside the ASIC
and is a result of the circuit topology employed.
Best regards,
Fernando
Fernando J. Barbosa wrote:
> Hall D Electronics:
>
> Hi Yves,
>
> Did you say the shields are not connected at all? That's it! The
> cause of the oscillations is due to the fact that the cables
> connecting the sense wires to the HV board are just antennas - their
> shields, to be effective, need to be connected to some low impedance
> reference point. Because these cables are RG174, I believe from a
> previous picture, the maximum potential they can tolerate is about 900
> V. Therefore, their shields cannot be connected to GND.
>
> Looking at the layout of the HV board, I notice there is a resistor
> (R50) connecting a trace to the HV and with a decoupling capacitor (at
> the bottom of the board). Was this trace meant to connect the shields
> of the cables to the HV reference? In this case, the potential between
> the inner conductors and the shields is about zero. The shield has
> then a low AC impedance to GND through the capacitor. You have to be
> careful how you route the cables for safety but try connecting the
> shields to this trace. You may want to the decrease R50 to 10 kOhm or so.
>
> Alternatives? Use thicker cables that can handle 3 KV (RG58?) -
> this may not be an option; bring the sense wire pins out of the gas
> volume and design a HV board with short traces and good shielding.
> There may be others that we need to look at carefully.
>
> Also, I noticed that the decoupling capacitors are 33 pF - a bit on
> the low side. I would change the capacitors to 220 pF, 3KV. This value
> is not critical - just a commonly available capacitor.
>
> Best regards,
> Fernando
>
> Yves Van Haarlem wrote:
>> Hi Fernando,
>>
>> I made a report of all the tests I did today, you can find it on the
>> wiki:
>>
>> http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/software/wiki/index.php/CDC_19_12_2007
>>
>>
>> It should include answers of your questions and measurements you
>> suggested.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Yves
>> /--------------------------------
>> / Yves Van Haarlem
>> _--~~--_ /
>> /~/_| |_\~\ / Carnegie Mellon University
>> |____________| / Department of Physics
>> |[][][][][][]|:= / Wean Hall room 8404
>> __| __ |__ \ Pittsburgh, PA 15213
>> | ||. | == | | \ USA
>> (| ||__| == | |) \
>> | |[] [] == | | \ Tel.: +1 412 268-6949
>> | |____________| | \ +1 412 641-9252
>> /__\ /__\ \ Fax.: +1 412 681-0648
>> ~~ ~~ \-----------------------------------
>>
>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Fernando J. Barbosa wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Yves,
>>>
>>> I have attached the results I obtained from the tests with the
>>> interposer + Preamp Card + cable + termination. As you can see, the
>>> pulse response is quite nice and the noise is also quite low.
>>>
>>> As I mentioned before, the oscillations you observe with your set
>>> up are definitely a result of the connections to the preamp card. I
>>> believe your tests over the last few days showed that ground loops
>>> are not the cause.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Fernando
>>>
>