[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pion energy deposition (fwd)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 08:14:42 -0500
From: Scott Teige <teige@dustbunny.physics.indiana.edu>
To: James Hubbard <jhubbard@mcs.uvawise.edu>
Cc: David Doughty <doughty@pcs.cnu.edu>,
Dr. Richard Jones <jonesrt@uconnvm.uconn.edu>,
Dr. EltonSmith <elton@jlab.org>
Subject: Re: Pion energy deposition (fwd)
Hi All,
The agreement actually looks rather good to me. I get 16% between 0.1
and 0.2, MC gets 22%. I get 9% between .2 and .3, MC gets 10%. The
fraction that do not interact (when measured from data) depends on
software thresholds, this may be a source of disagreement. The shape
of the energy fraction distribution also seems to agree but a
numerical comparison would be nice.
If you need/want anyhthing further from me, just let me know.
S.
-------------------
> Hello everyone,
>
> Dr. Teige thanks for the information. I'm attaching a plot from our
data for
> just a pi+. I've moved all of the non interacting pi+'s off of the
graph.
>
> This is what I'm getting for the X(1600) -> n pi+ pi- pi+. The data
is for a
> single track. The graphs for the other pi- and pi+ are basically
the same.
>
> Total Events 9851
> Non Inter: 2170 22%
> .1 - .2 2154 22%
> .2 - .3 1008 10%
> > .8 75 0.7%
>
> There seems to be quite a bit of difference between what we're
getting and what
> Dr. Teige is getting.
>
> James Hubbard
>
>
> David Doughty wrote:
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:48:05 -0500
> > From: Scott Teige <teige@dustbunny.physics.indiana.edu>
> > To: doughty@jlab.org, richard.t.jones@uconn, edu@indiana.edu
> > Subject: Pion energy deposition
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've measured the pions energy deposition fraction from
> > E852 data. I do the following:
> >
> > 1) I select data where the trigger had no LGD requirement
> > 2) I find charged tracks in the spectrometer
> > 3) I swim those tracks to the plane of the LGD and demand
> > the projected point be in the useful area of the LGD
> > 4) I find the nearest cluster to the projected impact point
> > 5) If that cluster is within 20 cm of the impact point I assume
> > it is associated with the pion.
> > 6) If no cluster is found, an LGD energy of zero is used
otherwise,
> > the observed energy in the LGD is used.
> > 7) I plot up E_lgd/E_pion
> >
> > I find:
> >
> > 43% Do not interact
> > 55% Deposit less than 10% of their energy
> > 71% Deposit less than 20% of their energy
> > 82% " 30% "
> > 2% deposit more than 80%
> >
> > The distribution is attached. Hope this helps.
> >
> > S.
> >
> > Scott Teige
> > Mail teige@dustbunny.physics.indiana.edu
> > WWW http://anthrax.physics.indiana.edu/~teige
> >
> > I can often be found near
> > N39 10.400, W86 35.490, +952 ft Mean Sea level
> >
> > ________________Deep and Pithy Saying:__________________
> > avoid partisan witch hunts, endless investigations or fishing
> > expeditions
> >
> > Ari Fleischer, White House Spokesman, 9, Jan, 2002
> >
> >
> >
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> >
>
>
Scott Teige
Mail teige@dustbunny.physics.indiana.edu
WWW http://anthrax.physics.indiana.edu/~teige
I can often be found near
N39 10.400, W86 35.490, +952 ft Mean Sea level
________________Deep and Pithy Saying:__________________
avoid partisan witch hunts, endless investigations or fishing
expeditions
Ari Fleischer, White House Spokesman, 9, Jan, 2002