Matt, Ok, so now renormalize this factor by the typical energy per physics event deposited in the barrel (~2 GeV) and you find the time of 12s starts to look prohibitive. Richard J. Blake Leverington wrote: > Hi Matt, > > I used one wrong parameter in the simulations I ran so I had to redo > them. It actually takes 0.3 seconds per event. So 10 times longer. > I've redone the simulation Richard asked for. > > -Blake > > Matthew Shepherd wrote: >> >> Hi Blake and Richard, >> >> If the full simulation of the fibers/shower in the BCAL only takes >> 0.03 seconds per event, what is the argument for not building this >> directly into the mainstream GlueX simulation instead of trying to >> parametrize these effects? >> >> -Matt >>
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature