Re: http://sisyphus.phys.uregina.ca/~rafael/BCal/MC/beamtest/19_06_2006/

[Rafael Hakobyan <hakobyar@uregina.ca>]

Title:

Hi Elton,

Yes, I agree with you that visually the difference between collimator
apertures is very small
and indeed it might be helpful to give a fitted sigma  to each
distribution. 
I'll do that and let you know about the outcome. 

With kind regards,
Rafael    
   


Elton Smith wrote:
> HI Rafael,
>
> Visually the difference between collimator apertures is very small,
> although the central peak does seem to decrease somewhat with increasing
> diameter.  It might be helpful to give a fitted sigma to each distribution
> to have a quantitative comparison between settings.
>
> Still, I assume the conclusion is that we can use the 2.6 mm collimator?
>
>
> Cheers, Elton.
>
>
>
>
> Elton Smith
> Jefferson Lab
> elton@jlab.org
> (757) 269-7625
>
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Rafael Hakobyan wrote:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> > Please, find the time distribution on the web site
> >         http://sisyphus.phys.uregina.ca/~rafael/BCal/MC/beamtest/19_06_2006/
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Rafael
> >
> >
> > David Lawrence wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > >    I've decided to try and start writing up minutes of the software
> > > meetings again. Find the minutes of today's meeting at:
> > >
> > > http://www.jlab.org/~davidl/HallD/Minutes/Software_2006_06_26
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > -David
> > >
> > >     
> >