[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: hddm_cull_events

To: "Mark M. Ito" <marki@jlab.org>
Subject: Re: hddm_cull_events
From: Simon Taylor <staylor@jlab.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:53:24 -0500
CC: halld-offline@jlab.org
In-Reply-To: <4989AC5D.2080600@jlab.org>
References: <4989AC5D.2080600@jlab.org>
Reply-To: Simon Taylor <staylor@jlab.org>
Sender: owner-halld-offline@jlab.org
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080915)

Hi, Mark.

I think this is a useful utility (I use it quite frequently), so I agree 
with your suggestion.

Simon
Mark M. Ito wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I propose that we build hddm_cull_events in the standard build by
> default. What d'y'all think?
>
>  -- Mark
>
>
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: hddm_cull_events
  - From: David Lawrence <davidl@jlab.org>

References:
- hddm_cull_events
  - From: "Mark M. Ito" <marki@jlab.org>

Prev by Date: which to edit: hddm template or schema?
Next by Date: Re: which to edit: hddm template or schema?
Prev by thread: hddm_cull_events
Next by thread: Re: hddm_cull_events
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread