[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: Re: init not called?]



Hi David,

Just a comment from the perspective of a user more than a developer of 
the software. Is it possible to have it compile JANA in HALLD_HOME if 
the current version of JANA isn't up to date? I don't always have root 
access to the shared version of JANA on the Indiana cluster so I've had 
to download and compile it in HALLD_HOME anyway since this seems to have 
solved the errors I was getting when i was trying to recalibrate the 
BCAL with the updated svn trunk.  I imagine other users will have to do 
the same.

Cheers,
-Blake

David Lawrence wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>    Here is an exchange that took place between Matt and I earlier 
> today for those who are interested. The basic message is that the is 
> some flaky behavior in the repository trunk right now so if you are 
> living on the bleeding edge, be prepared to bleed.
>
> -David
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:     Re: init not called?
> Date:     Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:06:09 -0400
> From:     Matthew Shepherd <mashephe@indiana.edu>
> To:     David Lawrence <davidl@jlab.org>
> References:     <AB4C8AF1-CB8A-472C-BC36-91EBB37AF113@indiana.edu> 
> <49D4DBE0.4080207@jlab.org>
>
>
>
> David,
>
> No problem -- thanks the note -- my solution works now.  If you feel  
> appropriate, you might send an email to the software group?  I spun 
> my  wheels for a while on this.  The symptom in my case was actually 
> a  segfault in the event loop.  I searched all over and found it was 
> due  to a TTree Fill() command that was being called on a null pointer 
> (the  output tree didn't get setup in init()).
>
> -Matt
>
> On Apr 2, 2009, at 11:38 AM, David Lawrence wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>>   I've run into some problems with this too recently. In fact, I  
>> just traced down an issue with it last night. It has to do with  
>> changes in the most recent version of JANA (0.5.1). In that release,  
>> a somewhat significant change was made to how initializations were  
>> done in order to better accommodate GUIs which operate in a slightly  
>> different way.
>>
>>   The fix seems to depend on the exact version of JANA and the Hall- 
>> D source code that is being used. For me, the main thing that was  
>> needed was to make the JApplication::Init() method virtual so that  
>> DApplication::Init() gets called properly. I'm not sure that would  
>> resolve the issue in your case.
>>
>>   All I can say for now is that I'm seeing similar issues and I'm  
>> trying to fix them as I come across them. I'm hoping to put out a  
>> new JANA version (0.5.2) next week that addresses this and a new  
>> tagged release of the Hall-D software the week after that that  
>> meshes well with JANA 0.5.2. In the meantime, hopefully you can limp  
>> along with what you have.
>>
>> Sorry for the inconvenience.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -David
>>
>> Matthew Shepherd wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> I seem to have a processor that has an init routine that is not  
>>> getting called.  I can't figure out why this is.  I checked other  
>>> sample processors in the repository and the function seems to be  
>>> defined correctly:
>>>
>>>    jerror_t init(void);                        ///< Called once at  
>>> program start.
>>>
>>> I got around it by calling init in the constructor, but this isn't  
>>> the best solution -- any ideas?
>>>
>>> -Matt
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> David Lawrence Ph.D.
>> Staff Scientist                 Office: (757)269-5567    [[[  [   [ 
>> [       Jefferson Lab                   Pager:   (757)584-5567   [  [ 
>> [ [ [ [   http://www.jlab.org/~davidl     davidl@jlab.org          
>> [[[  [[ [[ [[[
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>
>