[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: Kfit with timing
- To: Matt <bellis@ernest.phys.cmu.edu>
- Subject: Re: Fwd: Kfit with timing
- From: Eugene Chudakov <gen@jlab.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:47:55 -0400 (EDT)
- cc: halld-pid@jlab.org
- In-Reply-To: <a9b9d4860803201030l53a59cb3gce17f34f98ac4b57@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <a9b9d4860803140915t3f1738d1v4afafc7ec0842e12@mail.gmail.com> <a9b9d4860803171519m1feba448l86ca5b803fff8b68@mail.gmail.com><a9b9d4860803201030l53a59cb3gce17f34f98ac4b57@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-To: Eugene Chudakov <gen@jlab.org>
- Sender: owner-halld-pid@jlab.org
Hall D PID Mail List:
Matt,
I am going to include a slide on the kinem. fitting with the something
like:
- 3-C fit improves the track resolutions
- kin. fitting allows a considerable improvement in identification of
events with kaons over simple kin. constraints.
- the results depend on prominance of backrounds which are flat
or non-Gaussian in the residual space.
- in the ideal case a strong possible suppression can been obtained
- the work is in progress
You may send me a few statements (items) you would like to make.
Also, you may include a plot. Will you do it?
Yesterday, I tried the 3-C fit, using the event 3-momentum. It gave me some additional
BG reduction, a factor of 2 perhaps, with simple cuts and without
a signal suppression. I will look further into it.
BTW, what improvement in track momentum resolution did you obtain with the
3-momentum fit? For p2K3pi events I get on average 2.4%-->2.0% - not that much.
I assumed the diagonal covariance matrix for p,theta,phi.
The energy residual becomes very narrow for "true" events,
so adding the 4-th fit should not change the track resolution.
------------------------------------------------------
Eugene Chudakov
http://www.jlab.org/~gen
phone (757) 269 6959 fax (757) 269 5703
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
12000 Jefferson Ave, Newport News, VA 23606 USA