Hi Yang,
This would explain the discrepancy. It looks like this was not updated.
I will talk to Rebecca Yasky.
Thanks,
Tim
Guangliang Yang wrote:
> Dear Tim and Franz,
>
> I don't know what is going on about the civil drawing. But I look
> back the old email, I found, in 2006, Jim had told civil clearly that
> the distance from the Goni to the intersection of the photon beam and
> the electron beam( to beam dump) is 6.334 m. Please see attached email
> from Jim. From the drawing you sent around I found that this distance
> is only 5.486m.
>
> The magnet size is 3.09m, and the distance between two magnets is
> roughly 40 cm. Because these two magnets are not parallel to each
> other, I don't want to give an exact number.
>
> Regards
>
> Yang
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Kellie"
> <j.kellie@physics.gla.ac.uk>
> To: "'Elton Smith'" <elton@jlab.org>; "'Yang Guangliang'"
> <y.guangliang@physics.gla.ac.uk>
> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 3:31 PM
> Subject: RE: Hall D Updated Concept Submittal - Review Comments
> Requested (fwd)
>
>
>> Hi Elton,
>>
>> Please find attached our comments concerning the civil drawings.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Jim.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Elton Smith [mailto:elton@jlab.org]
>> Sent: 03 March 2006 20:14
>> To: Jim Kellie; Yang Guangliang
>> Subject: Hall D Updated Concept Submittal - Review Comments Requested
>> (fwd)
>>
>>
>> Hi Eric, collaborators,
>>
>> The A&E firm has provided their concept submital. We need to give
>> feedback
>> by Monday. The files are available at
>>
>> http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/civil/drawings/design35/
>>
>> I think we will need a phone conference at least between Eric and JLab
>> folks to review and consolodate any comments to pass on to Civil. Due to
>> the short time frame, I suggest we collect comments over the weekend and
>> review them on 1:30 on Monday afternoon. If there are any others that
>> should take a look at the drawigs, pass them on and have them send
>> comments to me.
>>
>> Cheers, Elton.
>>
>> Elton Smith
>> Jefferson Lab
>> elton@jlab.org
>> (757) 269-7625
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 13:35:09 -0500 (EST)
>> From: Elton Smith <elton@jlab.org>
>> To: Eric Scott <ebscott@indiana.edu>
>> Cc: Elton Smith <elton@jlab.org>, Elliott Wolin <wolin@jlab.org>
>> Subject: Hall D Updated Concept Submittal - Review Comments Requested
>> (fwd)
>>
>>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> We probably need to have a phone conference to go over any comments on
>> this submittal and make sure that all our concerns are covered. I have
>> place the files indicated below at the following location for ease of
>> access:
>>
>> http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/civil/drawings/design35/
>>
>> Let me know if there is any problem viewing them.
>>
>> Cheers, Elton.
>>
>>
>> Elton Smith
>> Jefferson Lab
>> elton@jlab.org
>> (757) 269-7625
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 13:14:14 -0500
>> From: Rebecca Yasky <ryasky@jlab.org>
>> To: Elton Smith <elton@jlab.org>, Elliott Wolin <wolin@jlab.org>
>> Cc: Suresh Chandra <chandra@jlab.org>, Celia Whitlatch
>> <whitlatc@jlab.org>,
>> pavel@jlab.org, abkemeier <abkemeie@jlab.org>,
>> Will Brooks <brooksw@jlab.org>
>> Subject: Hall D Updated Concept Submittal - Review Comments Requested
>>
>> Elton, Elliott, & Erik,
>> We have received the Updated Concept Submittal (Updated Concept Dwgs and
>> Design Analysis) from the A-E.. Comments are due to me on March 6,
>> 2006. Here are links to the Drawings file:///M:/planteng/12
>> GeV/Design/Hall_D_Design/Concept_Update/Concept_Submittal/Drawings/HALL-D_Co
>>
>> ncept_Dwg_Feb06.pdf
>> <imap://ryasky@mail.jlab.org:993/fetch%3EUID%3E/Drafts%3E215?part=1.1.1.2&fi
>>
>> lename=HALL-D_Concept_Dwg_Feb06.pdf>
>> and the Design Analysis file:///M:/planteng/12
>> GeV/Design/Hall_D_Design/Concept_Update/Concept_Submittal/Design_Analysis/De
>>
>> sign
>> Analysis 2-28-06.pdf
>> <imap://ryasky@mail.jlab.org:993/fetch%3EUID%3E/Drafts%3E215?part=1.1.1.3&fi
>>
>> lename=Design%20Analysis%202-28-06.pdf>.
>> Also, attached is a review comment form that you have the option to
>> use. To optimize your review effort, Facilities Management will review
>> the Design Analysis and I will send a separate email (tomorrow)
>> indicating the section(s) we want you to specifically review for
>> concurrence and/or comments.
>>
>> I will be providing hard copies of half-size drawings to:
>>
>> * Elton Smith
>> * Erik Abkemeier.
>>
>> Some of your previous comments have not been incorporated due to my
>> delay getting the info to the A-E. Please see my responses to your
>> earlier comments in blue below. You do not need to repeat these
>> comments.
>>
>> If you have any questions, please feel free to call me.
>> Rebecca
>>
Concept_Update_Review_Cmts (2)_Glasgow.doc