[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: Re: Tagger Follow Up Questions]]

Thanks Yang. We are currently calling for a 1 piece design which correlates to your original concept. What other changes did the Russians do that may affect the analysis?

Tim.

Tim

Guangliang Yang wrote:
Dear Tim,
 
     Only items 2 and 8 are relevant to the magnetic field calculation. In my magnet model,  there are no gaps between yokes and the pole edges are rounded. Actually, I need to redo the magnetic field calculation, because the Russians made some modifications that may slightly affect the field distribution.  I did the magnetic field analysis based on the conceptual design, but didn't do it based on the 35% drawing.   I plan to redo the magnetic field analysis after the stage 1 of the statement of work , because most of the details should be finalized at that time,  
 
Regards
 
Yang
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 1:14 PM
Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: Re: Tagger Follow Up Questions]]

Hi Yang,

A clarification question has been asked. I think the answer is yes, but can you confirm. The question is if the magnetic field analysis already done includes the "addendum" items in the specification?

Tim

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Tagger Follow Up Questions]
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:59:52 -0500
From: Ross Small <small@jlab.org>
To: Timothy Whitlatch <whitey@jlab.org> 


Tim,

I sent the answers that you provided and the vendor has further follow-up and 
need an answer right away.  Please respond as soon as possible.  If we 
need to set up a conference call, let me know.

Ross


-- 
W. Ross Small
Subcontracts Group Manager
Jefferson Lab
628 Hofstadter Road, Suite 5
Newport News, VA 23606

Phone 757-269-7603  Fax 757-269-7057
e-mail  small@jlab.org