Yang,
Yes, and don't forget the Purcell filter introduced by Franz. It is a
good idea, but it will change things from your original calculation,
for the better we expect!
Richard J.
Tim Whitlatch wrote:
47A0B087.4060308@jlab.org">
Thanks Yang. We are currently calling for a 1 piece design which
correlates to your original concept. What other changes did the
Russians do that may affect the analysis?
Tim.
Tim
Guangliang Yang wrote:
Dear Tim,
Only items 2 and 8 are
relevant
to the magnetic field calculation. In my magnet model, there are
no gaps between yokes and the pole edges are rounded. Actually, I need
to redo the magnetic field calculation, because the Russians made some
modifications that may slightly affect the field distribution. I did
the magnetic field analysis based on the conceptual design, but didn't
do it based on the 35% drawing. I plan to redo the magnetic field
analysis after the stage 1 of the statement of work , because most
of the details should be finalized at that time,
Regards
Yang
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 1:14 PM
Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: Re: Tagger Follow Up Questions]]
Hi Yang,
A clarification question has been asked. I think the answer is yes, but
can you confirm. The question is if the magnetic field analysis already
done includes the "addendum" items in the specification?
Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Tim,
I sent the answers that you provided and the vendor has further follow-up and
need an answer right away. Please respond as soon as possible. If we
need to set up a conference call, let me know.
Ross
--
W. Ross Small
Subcontracts Group Manager
Jefferson Lab
628 Hofstadter Road, Suite 5
Newport News, VA 23606
Phone 757-269-7603 Fax 757-269-7057
e-mail small@jlab.org
|