Re: pre-brief materials outline

[Elke-Caroline Aschenauer <elke@jlab.org>]

On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Jim Stewart wrote:

Dear Jim and Richard,

with all respect we had a 6 hour meeting on all the tagger and beamline is
this agenda below really realistic. I think better just discuss the review
agenda and the pre-brief material and what is needed to get the pre-brief.

I think we need the following prebrief material.

1. photon beam, requirements/ parameters and simulations done
2. a write up on the 2 detectors microscope and hodoscope
3. the tagger magnet design
4. technical drawings on all the components
5. background and the impact on the detector
   ----> Alex have you repeated your trigger simulation with the new
         knowledge on background from the photon beam
6. pair spectrometer
7. diamond research

so that is a lot of work and the reviewers need it at least 1.5 weeks in
advance to the review.

this means it should go to the reviewers 7th of November as the experience
shows we need at least one if not 2 iterations in the group of all this
documents. I think the internal deadline should be 27th of October.

We need also to set up a schedule for dry runs. Jim can you do this on the
wiki.

thanks elke



> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:39:02 -0400
> From: Jim Stewart <jstewart@jlab.org>
> To: Richard Jones <richard.t.jones@uconn.edu>
> Cc: Elke-Caroline Aschenauer <elke@jlab.org>
> Subject: Re: pre-brief materials outline
>
> Hello Richard
>
> I have not spent much time thinking about pre-brief material. Revising
> the agenda and generating a list of pre-brief material will already use
> up most the meeting. I propose dropping Sascha from your agenda and then
> moving the agenda pre-brief discussion to the start of the meeting. - Jim
>
>
>       Original Agenda
>
>    1. Progress on simulation of the collimators - /Sascha/
>    2. Progress toward a new tagger field map for simulations - /Yang/
>    3. Resolution on tagger pole shape - /Jim/, /Yang/
>    4. Remaining simulation studies needed for review - /Richard/
>    5. Revised draft schedule for the review - /Richard/
>    6. Writeups needed for the pre-brief materials packet - /Jim/
>
>
>
>
> Richard Jones wrote:
> > Jim,
> >
> > Last meeting you reminded us about the need to get together an outline
> > of the pre-brief materials packet for the review in November.  Have
> > you had a chance to think any more about that?  I have put you down on
> > the agenda for Thursday to propose something for discussion.  Is that
> > ok with you?
> >
> > Richard Jones
>
>

 ( `,_' )+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=
  )    `\                                                  -
 /    '. |                                                  +
 |       `,              Elke-Caroline Aschenauer            =
  \,_  `-/                                                    -
  ,&&&&&V         Jefferson Lab                                +
 ,&&&&&&&&:       HALL-D 12C / F381       121-A Atlantic Avenue =
,&&&&&&&&&&;      Suite 8                 Hampton, VA 23664      -
|  |&&&&&&&;\     12000 Jefferson Ave                             +
|  |       :_) _  Newport News, VA 23606  Tel.:  001-757-224-1216  =
|  |       ;--' | Mail:  elke@jlab.org    Mobil: 001-757-256-5224   -
'--'   `-.--.   |                                                    +
   \_    |  |---' Tel.:  001-757-269-5352                             =
     `-._\__/     Fax.:  001-757-269-6331                              -
            +=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+