Re: pre-brief materials outline

[Alexander Somov <somov@jlab.org>]

Hello Elke,

Yes, sure, I will prepare few plots for the trigger
simulation with bg shortly.

Cheers,
       Alex



On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Elke-Caroline Aschenauer wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Jim Stewart wrote:
>
> Dear Jim and Richard,
>
> with all respect we had a 6 hour meeting on all the tagger and beamline is
> this agenda below really realistic. I think better just discuss the review
> agenda and the pre-brief material and what is needed to get the pre-brief.
>
> I think we need the following prebrief material.
>
> 1. photon beam, requirements/ parameters and simulations done
> 2. a write up on the 2 detectors microscope and hodoscope
> 3. the tagger magnet design
> 4. technical drawings on all the components
> 5. background and the impact on the detector
>    ----> Alex have you repeated your trigger simulation with the new
>          knowledge on background from the photon beam
> 6. pair spectrometer
> 7. diamond research
>
> so that is a lot of work and the reviewers need it at least 1.5 weeks in
> advance to the review.
>
> this means it should go to the reviewers 7th of November as the experience
> shows we need at least one if not 2 iterations in the group of all this
> documents. I think the internal deadline should be 27th of October.
>
> We need also to set up a schedule for dry runs. Jim can you do this on the
> wiki.
>
> thanks elke
>
>
>
> > Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:39:02 -0400
> > From: Jim Stewart <jstewart@jlab.org>
> > To: Richard Jones <richard.t.jones@uconn.edu>
> > Cc: Elke-Caroline Aschenauer <elke@jlab.org>
> > Subject: Re: pre-brief materials outline
> >
> > Hello Richard
> >
> > I have not spent much time thinking about pre-brief material. Revising
> > the agenda and generating a list of pre-brief material will already use
> > up most the meeting. I propose dropping Sascha from your agenda and then
> > moving the agenda pre-brief discussion to the start of the meeting. - Jim
> >
> >
> >       Original Agenda
> >
> >    1. Progress on simulation of the collimators - /Sascha/
> >    2. Progress toward a new tagger field map for simulations - /Yang/
> >    3. Resolution on tagger pole shape - /Jim/, /Yang/
> >    4. Remaining simulation studies needed for review - /Richard/
> >    5. Revised draft schedule for the review - /Richard/
> >    6. Writeups needed for the pre-brief materials packet - /Jim/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Richard Jones wrote:
> > > Jim,
> > >
> > > Last meeting you reminded us about the need to get together an outline
> > > of the pre-brief materials packet for the review in November.  Have
> > > you had a chance to think any more about that?  I have put you down on
> > > the agenda for Thursday to propose something for discussion.  Is that
> > > ok with you?
> > >
> > > Richard Jones
> >
> >
>
>  ( `,_' )+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=
>   )    `\                                                  -
>  /    '. |                                                  +
>  |       `,              Elke-Caroline Aschenauer            =
>   \,_  `-/                                                    -
>   ,&&&&&V         Jefferson Lab                                +
>  ,&&&&&&&&:       HALL-D 12C / F381       121-A Atlantic Avenue =
> ,&&&&&&&&&&;      Suite 8                 Hampton, VA 23664      -
> |  |&&&&&&&;\     12000 Jefferson Ave                             +
> |  |       :_) _  Newport News, VA 23606  Tel.:  001-757-224-1216  =
> |  |       ;--' | Mail:  elke@jlab.org    Mobil: 001-757-256-5224   -
> '--'   `-.--.   |                                                    +
>    \_    |  |---' Tel.:  001-757-269-5352                             =
>      `-._\__/     Fax.:  001-757-269-6331                              -
>             +=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+
>
>