[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Additional data
Hi Gerard,
For your information: I used a
KINGS LEMO 1079-1 splitter. Unfortunately a google search did not give me
the specifications of this splitter.
Cheers,
Yves
/--------------------------------
/ Yves Van Haarlem
_--~~--_ /
/~/_| |_\~\ / Carnegie Mellon University
|____________| / Department of Physics
|[][][][][][]|:= / Wean Hall room 8404
__| __ |__ \ Pittsburgh, PA 15213
| ||. | == | | \ USA
(| ||__| == | |) \
| |[] [] == | | \ Tel.: +1 412 268-6949
| |____________| | \ +1 412 641-9252
/__\ /__\ \ Fax.: +1 412 681-0648
~~ ~~ \-----------------------------------
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Gerard Visser wrote:
> Hi Yves,
> Why do you not trigger the ADC readout internally? The Struck ADC
> certainly has this capability. Isn't it supported by the JLab/CODA setup? It
> would be really best to avoid splitters etc. on your analog signals. Unless
> you've verified them by for instance a network analyzer sweep up to at least
> 100 MHz... Don't trust a homebrew splitter without such a verification, if
> the signal shape is important.
> If the DAQ setup cannot be triggered internally from the ADC, you
> should nevertheless at least be able to use the ADC's internal trigger
> features, set for front panel LEMO trigger out, and connect that to the DAQ
> system trigger interface as per usual (as you would with your cosmic paddle
> trigger).
>
> Gerard
>
> Yves Van Haarlem wrote:
> ...
>> A collimated (0.5~mm) Fe-55 source is placed close to the straw. The
>> signal coming from the straw is preamplified and shaped. After the shaper
>> the signal is split in two, using a passive LEMO splitter. One part goes
>> to a discriminator (it is not a CFD) afterwards it is delayed a bit and
>> triggers the fADC. The other part goes directly to an fADC input.
>> ...
>