Re: Simulation section of CDR

[Elton Smith <elton@jlab.org>]

HI Matt,

For the upcoming reviews we will need to update all the plots of raw rates
for the new geometry to compare with the rates that you produced last
year with the old geometry. This will be useful for the calorimetry as
well as DC reviews. Are you planning on getting updated rates or how much
effort is it to update them?

Thanks, Elton.




Elton Smith
Jefferson Lab MS 12H5
12000 Jefferson Ave
Suite # 16
Newport News, VA 23606
elton@jlab.org
(757) 269-7625
(757) 269-6331 fax

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Matthew Shepherd wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
> I've received detailed comments from Alex on this section including a
> lot of typographical issues.  I hope to incorporate these sometime
> today and circulate a new draft.  Feel free to read for scope and
> content, but at this stage you may want to wait until the next draft
> before doing a detailed markup.
>
> -Matt
>
>
> On Jan 28, 2008, at 2:32 AM, Matthew Shepherd wrote:
>
> >
> > Dear calorimetry enthusiasts,
> >
> > You can find a fairly complete draft of the simulation section of
> > the CDR that Mihajlo and I have worked on here:
> >
> > http://dustbunny.physics.indiana.edu/~mashephe/simulation.pdf
> >
> > We will be putting on the finishing touches in a few noted places
> > and merging with Alex.  I wanted to make the draft now available for
> > people to read and comment on content.  (As written it lacks some
> > all-important concluding paragraphs which need to be carefully
> > stated.)
> >
> > Also on our "to-do" list is to check into the pi^0 mass resolution
> > in BCAL vs. FCAL.  Both have comparable energy resolutions but much
> > different pi^0 mass resolutions.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >
>
>