Re: Simulation section of CDR

[Matthew Shepherd <mashephe@indiana.edu>]

Hi Elton,

In principle it is not too much work to update them since the process  
is fairly well scripted.  I'm working on getting the jobs running now,  
but if I get hung up this may have to go on the back burner.  I'll let  
you know how progress is going.

-Matt


On Jan 28, 2008, at 9:29 AM, Elton Smith wrote:

>
> HI Matt,
>
> For the upcoming reviews we will need to update all the plots of raw  
> rates
> for the new geometry to compare with the rates that you produced last
> year with the old geometry. This will be useful for the calorimetry as
> well as DC reviews. Are you planning on getting updated rates or how  
> much
> effort is it to update them?
>
> Thanks, Elton.
>
>
>
>
> Elton Smith
> Jefferson Lab MS 12H5
> 12000 Jefferson Ave
> Suite # 16
> Newport News, VA 23606
> elton@jlab.org
> (757) 269-7625
> (757) 269-6331 fax
>
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Matthew Shepherd wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've received detailed comments from Alex on this section including a
>> lot of typographical issues.  I hope to incorporate these sometime
>> today and circulate a new draft.  Feel free to read for scope and
>> content, but at this stage you may want to wait until the next draft
>> before doing a detailed markup.
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>>
>> On Jan 28, 2008, at 2:32 AM, Matthew Shepherd wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Dear calorimetry enthusiasts,
>>>
>>> You can find a fairly complete draft of the simulation section of
>>> the CDR that Mihajlo and I have worked on here:
>>>
>>> http://dustbunny.physics.indiana.edu/~mashephe/simulation.pdf
>>>
>>> We will be putting on the finishing touches in a few noted places
>>> and merging with Alex.  I wanted to make the draft now available for
>>> people to read and comment on content.  (As written it lacks some
>>> all-important concluding paragraphs which need to be carefully
>>> stated.)
>>>
>>> Also on our "to-do" list is to check into the pi^0 mass resolution
>>> in BCAL vs. FCAL.  Both have comparable energy resolutions but much
>>> different pi^0 mass resolutions.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>