[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Simple Object Access Protocol resent
- To: heddle@pcs.cnu.edu
- Subject: Re: Simple Object Access Protocol resent
- From: Graham Heyes <heyes@jlab.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 22:26:11 -0400
- CC: gurjyan@jlab.org, heddle@jdhtech.com, dennisl@csit.fsu.edu, wolin@jlab.org, elton@jlab.org, cords@jlab.org, marki@jlab.org, mecking@jlab.org, coda@jlab.org, halld-jlab@jlab.org
- References: <200105302018.f4UKIEn12870@www.web4m.com>
- Reply-To: Graham Heyes <heyes@jlab.org>
- Sender: owner-halld-jlab@jlab.org
Something happened to the wrapping of text at the end of a line so I am
re-sending my last mail. Hopefully you can read this...
Snip, snip. I cut out the forwarding of eveyone elses text to save
electrons ;^)
I too looked at SOAP and agree with Vardan. It appears to be a plain
text specification of a wire protocol for the encoding of inter-process
communication as plain text in an XML complient format. This is very
similar to what we did with DP in CODA 2 only much more powerful. It is
also very similar to what we envision, in a very loose way so far, as
the communication mechanism for control and monitoring in the next
generation of CODA..
I agree with Dave H's summary of CORBA and RMI, the same can also be
said of Chip's CDEV. Too complex. (Also CORBA and CDEV carry too much
C++ baggage).
I want to talk about CODA III plans in a couple of weeks time and hope
that you will all be very pleased with the direction we are taking.
Regards to you all as always,
Graham
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beware of Geeks bearing GIFS. http://www.jlab.org/coda Jefferson lab DAQ
group