[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: pre-brief materials outline



Hi Jim -

   I would guess that you are probably ok with these dates
for the practice talks. (Of course I could be wrong). 

   Probably what is more crucial is the  "drop-dead date" for the 
pre-brief material. I would assume that is around the 11'th or 12'th 
of November so that it can get to the reviewers. I don't see that
date on the Wiki yet.

    - Curtis
On Wed October 8 2008, Jim Stewart wrote:
> 
> Dear Curtis and Elke
> 
> If the Review is shifted to Thursday-Friday Nov 19 and 20, then would it 
> make sense to shift the
> Dry-Runs?
> 
> Dry-Run 1:  Thursday Nov 6 and Friday Nov 7
> Dry-Run 2: Thursday Nov 13 and Friday Nov 14
> 
> When do the final versions of the talks have to be given to the 12 GeV team?
> 
> 
> I understand that the Pre-Brief needs to go to the reviewers 1 week in 
> advance or on Nov 12th.
> This means the written part should be submitted to Elke on Nov. 5th.
> 
> 
> Is this correct?
> Jim
> 
> Curtis A. Meyer wrote:
> > The Wiki template for the review is now in place. We will need to figure
> > out what the dates are for things. I made guesses for the first and
> > second round of talks.
> > http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/software/wiki/index.php/Tagger_and_Beamline_Review
> >
> >
> >   Curtis
> >
> > On Wed September 24 2008, Elke-Caroline Aschenauer wrote:
> >   
> >> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Jim Stewart wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear Jim and Richard,
> >>
> >> with all respect we had a 6 hour meeting on all the tagger and beamline is
> >> this agenda below really realistic. I think better just discuss the review
> >> agenda and the pre-brief material and what is needed to get the pre-brief.
> >>
> >> I think we need the following prebrief material.
> >>
> >> 1. photon beam, requirements/ parameters and simulations done
> >> 2. a write up on the 2 detectors microscope and hodoscope
> >> 3. the tagger magnet design
> >> 4. technical drawings on all the components
> >> 5. background and the impact on the detector
> >>    ----> Alex have you repeated your trigger simulation with the new
> >>          knowledge on background from the photon beam
> >> 6. pair spectrometer
> >> 7. diamond research
> >>
> >> so that is a lot of work and the reviewers need it at least 1.5 weeks in
> >> advance to the review.
> >>
> >> this means it should go to the reviewers 7th of November as the experience
> >> shows we need at least one if not 2 iterations in the group of all this
> >> documents. I think the internal deadline should be 27th of October.
> >>
> >> We need also to set up a schedule for dry runs. Jim can you do this on the
> >> wiki.
> >>
> >> thanks elke
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>     
> >>> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:39:02 -0400
> >>> From: Jim Stewart <jstewart@jlab.org>
> >>> To: Richard Jones <richard.t.jones@uconn.edu>
> >>> Cc: Elke-Caroline Aschenauer <elke@jlab.org>
> >>> Subject: Re: pre-brief materials outline
> >>>
> >>> Hello Richard
> >>>
> >>> I have not spent much time thinking about pre-brief material. Revising
> >>> the agenda and generating a list of pre-brief material will already use
> >>> up most the meeting. I propose dropping Sascha from your agenda and then
> >>> moving the agenda pre-brief discussion to the start of the meeting. - Jim
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>       Original Agenda
> >>>
> >>>    1. Progress on simulation of the collimators - /Sascha/
> >>>    2. Progress toward a new tagger field map for simulations - /Yang/
> >>>    3. Resolution on tagger pole shape - /Jim/, /Yang/
> >>>    4. Remaining simulation studies needed for review - /Richard/
> >>>    5. Revised draft schedule for the review - /Richard/
> >>>    6. Writeups needed for the pre-brief materials packet - /Jim/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Richard Jones wrote:
> >>>       
> >>>> Jim,
> >>>>
> >>>> Last meeting you reminded us about the need to get together an outline
> >>>> of the pre-brief materials packet for the review in November.  Have
> >>>> you had a chance to think any more about that?  I have put you down on
> >>>> the agenda for Thursday to propose something for discussion.  Is that
> >>>> ok with you?
> >>>>
> >>>> Richard Jones
> >>>>         
> >>>       
> >>  ( `,_' )+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=
> >>   )    `\                                                  -
> >>  /    '. |                                                  +
> >>  |       `,              Elke-Caroline Aschenauer            =
> >>   \,_  `-/                                                    -
> >>   ,&&&&&V         Jefferson Lab                                +
> >>  ,&&&&&&&&:       HALL-D 12C / F381       121-A Atlantic Avenue =
> >> ,&&&&&&&&&&;      Suite 8                 Hampton, VA 23664      -
> >> |  |&&&&&&&;\     12000 Jefferson Ave                             +
> >> |  |       :_) _  Newport News, VA 23606  Tel.:  001-757-224-1216  =
> >> |  |       ;--' | Mail:  elke@jlab.org    Mobil: 001-757-256-5224   -
> >> '--'   `-.--.   |                                                    +
> >>    \_    |  |---' Tel.:  001-757-269-5352                             =
> >>      `-._\__/     Fax.:  001-757-269-6331                              -
> >>             +=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+
> >>
> >>     
> >
> >
> >
> >   
> 
> 



-- 
Professor Curtis A. Meyer        Department of Physics
Phone:  (412) 268-2745          Carnegie Mellon University
Fax:    (412) 681-0648            Pittsburgh PA 15213-3890
cmeyer@ernest.phys.cmu.edu  http://www.curtismeyer.com/