[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Meeting today
Hi Dan --
I was hoping for a meeting on the time scale of once every 2
weeks -- similar to the calorimetry and offline. I obviously don't
want to slow down the FDC work, but I also don't want to
overwhelm people with too many meetings.
I am clearly happy to schedule this at a different time from
the FDC meeting if you think that works better. However, it may
well be that you are simply *repeating* yourself in a second meeting
and adding 30 minutes to your meeting twice a month might be
more effective time-wise on everyone's part?
Let me know what your opinions are after you have thought about
this. Again, I don't want to force you into something that you feel slows
things down, but it might be that there is enough overlap on this time
scale that it might actually be useful for all concerned.
Cheers -- Curtis
On Thu November 15 2007, Daniel S. Carman wrote:
>
> Curtis,
>
> Our weekly FDC meetings are already quite packed with details
> and particulars regarding FDC design. These discussions are
> vitally important to moving forward on the FDC design and I would
> not like this discussion curtailed or sidetracked by other
> "distractions". So, my initial reaction is that including
> more topics and expanding the scope of our agendas would not
> be conducive to our FDC-specific work.
>
> The important issues of tracking and also combined CDC+FDC topics
> of course cannot be overlooked. I would be in favor of a separate
> meeting on these issues where just the relevant folks are involved.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Daniel
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> * *
> * Dr. Daniel S. Carman e-mail : carman@jlab.org *
> * Staff Scientist office : (757)-269-5586 *
> * Jefferson Laboratory web: www.jlab.org/~carman *
> * *
> **********************************************************************
>
>
>
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Curtis A. Meyer wrote:
>
> > Hi Dan --
> >
> > I have been wondering if it makes sense to try and
> > expand your regular FDC meetings to full tracking
> > meetings? If you can move your start time 15 minutes
> > later on Thursday, then we would be able to start participating
> > at CMU?
> >
> > thanks - Curtis
> > On Thu November 15 2007, Daniel S. Carman wrote:
> > >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > I have heard rumors that there is some confusion about whether or
> > > not there is an FDC meeting today. Of course we are having a
> > > meeting, I would not want anyone to have a free afternoon to get
> > > real work done. Anyway, the meeting is scheduled to start at
> > > 1:30 p.m. in F227. See you all there.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Daniel
> > >
> > >
> > > **********************************************************************
> > > * *
> > > * Dr. Daniel S. Carman e-mail : carman@jlab.org *
> > > * Staff Scientist office : (757)-269-5586 *
> > > * Jefferson Laboratory web: www.jlab.org/~carman *
> > > * *
> > > **********************************************************************
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Professor Curtis A. Meyer Department of Physics
> > Phone: (412) 268-2745 Carnegie Mellon University
> > Fax: (412) 681-0648 Pittsburgh PA 15213-3890
> > cmeyer@ernest.phys.cmu.edu http://www.curtismeyer.com/
> >
>
>
--
Professor Curtis A. Meyer Department of Physics
Phone: (412) 268-2745 Carnegie Mellon University
Fax: (412) 681-0648 Pittsburgh PA 15213-3890
cmeyer@ernest.phys.cmu.edu http://www.curtismeyer.com/