[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: remarks to slides



Hi Elke -

  the slides have been updated again. I will just need to use
my lap top to give my presentation. 

   curtis
On Tue March 25 2008, Elke-Caroline Aschenauer wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I have a couple of small remarks to the slides which have been posted in
> the last hours.
> 
> Fernando and Dan yours are final for me.
> 
> I gave my remarks to Elton and David in person.
> 
> Curtis, your slides have a lot of font problems in the powerpoint not so
> in the pdf. But that makes it difficult to use the overlays here. I guess
> it is a conflict with the new office we have here.
> page 18: Is the diagram the correct one to the plots below.  

    yes, it is correct.

> page 23: I would really not show the plot for 1GeV, because the funny
>          curve for 2007 is not caused by the geometry but by imperfections
>          of the tracking at this time.
>          In principle we should have run a simulation with the 2007 and
>          2008 geometry and the current tracking code to have a fair
>          comparison.

   fixed, I took the 2GeV/2 curves from david

> page 30: did you want to keep the sentence on vetoing charged particles in
>          the FCal instead of mentioning the trigger application of the ToF
> 
  fixed
> Eugene: slide 6, typo in simulation it is sumulation
>         slide 10 typo in interaction is is interactoins
>                  the picture of the geom is still the old 2007 one
>         slide 11 are your systematic uncertainties agree with the ones
>                  Simon send around, which are all the ones due to tracking
>                  effects
>         slide 14 is what you call a pion efficiency not a pion
>                  misidentification
>         slide 16 are your numbers for the BCal & FToF for the full
>                  momentum range till 4 GeV. If yes i think it would be
>                  good to quote for both detectors the efficiencies for the
>                  momentum range we hope we can do PID, < 1GeV Bcal and
>                  < 2.5GeV for the FToF
>         slide 23 hm, it is maybe my bias from inclusive physics but i find
>                  your first sub-bullet under 2 still la bit strong.
> 
> Tim: how are you doing with your final slides?
> 
> Cheers and thanks elke
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  ( `,_' )+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=
>   )    `\                                                  -
>  /    '. |                                                  +
>  |       `,              Elke-Caroline Aschenauer            =
>   \,_  `-/                                                    -
>   ,&&&&&V         Jefferson Lab                                +
>  ,&&&&&&&&:       HALL-D 12C / F381       121-A Atlantic Avenue =
> ,&&&&&&&&&&;      Suite 8                 Hampton, VA 23664      -
> |  |&&&&&&&;\     12000 Jefferson Ave                             +
> |  |       :_) _  Newport News, VA 23606  Tel.:  001-757-224-1216  =
> |  |       ;--' | Mail:  elke@jlab.org    Mobil: 001-757-256-5224   -
> '--'   `-.--.   |                                                    +
>    \_    |  |---' Tel.:  001-757-269-5352                             =
>      `-._\__/     Fax.:  001-757-269-6331                              -
>             +=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+
> 



-- 
Professor Curtis A. Meyer        Department of Physics
Phone:  (412) 268-2745          Carnegie Mellon University
Fax:    (412) 681-0648            Pittsburgh PA 15213-3890
cmeyer@ernest.phys.cmu.edu  http://www.curtismeyer.com/