[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Simulation update at collaboration meeting
Hi Curtis,
Thanks. We may need to take advantage of that. Once I hear back from
everyone, I will figure out what is needed to give everyone a reasonable
amount of time and then will coordinate with you on the final schedule.
Note that no matter what, I will need to leave by 16:45 at the latest in
order to administer my final exam which starts at 17:00. If that is the
case, I will arrange for someone else to take over as chair of the
session when I leave.
Regards,
-David
Curtis A. Meyer wrote:
> David -
>
> you should not feel completely constrained on the
> time window you have. If you need an extra 15-20
> minutes in your session, we can push the collaboration
> board meeting out.
>
> cheers - Curtis
> On Mon April 28 2008, David Lawrence wrote:
>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> This sounds very relevant. The one issue is the time. We have a
>> total of 1.5 hours to discuss everything regarding offline software. If
>> we put the talk there, then I think we will need to try and squeeze it
>> down to no more than 20 minutes total (including questions). The other
>> option is for you to present this during the beamline section on Friday
>> afternoon. I'm not sure who's chairing that, but that schedule may also
>> be tight. What do you think?
>>
>> Regards,
>> -David
>>
>> Richard Jones wrote:
>>
>>> Dave,
>>>
>>> Yes, I would like to address the question, "What are the beam
>>> intensity limits coming from detector simulation?" This question came
>>> up several times in the context of end-point physics at the PHP
>>> conference in March. Part of the answer to this question lies in the
>>> ultimate rate capabilities of the detector elements, especially the
>>> forward detectors, and the other part concerns the development of
>>> specific triggers that are adapted to the specific reactions of
>>> interest. As a first step, I will present something on the first
>>> issue: 20 minutes + 10 for discussion should be sufficient.
>>>
>>> Richard J.
>>>
>>>
>>> David Lawrence wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Richard,
>>>>
>>>> Is there anything you'd like to present or discuss during the
>>>> offline software section of the collaboration meeting next week
>>>> (Thurs. May 8th)?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Lawrence Ph.D.
Staff Scientist Office: (757)269-5567 [[[ [ [ [
Jefferson Lab Pager: (757)584-5567 [ [ [ [ [ [
http://www.jlab.org/~davidl davidl@jlab.org [[[ [[ [[ [[[
------------------------------------------------------------------------