[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Simulation update at collaboration meeting




Hi Curtis,

    Thanks. We may need to take advantage of that. Once I hear back from 
everyone, I will figure out what is needed to give everyone a reasonable 
amount of time and then will coordinate with you on the final schedule. 
Note that no matter what, I will need to leave by 16:45 at the latest in 
order to administer my final exam which starts at 17:00. If that is the 
case, I will arrange for someone else to take over as chair of the 
session when I leave.

Regards,
-David

Curtis A. Meyer wrote:
> David -
>
>   you should not feel completely constrained on the 
> time window you have. If you need an extra 15-20
> minutes in your session, we can push the collaboration
> board meeting out.
>
>    cheers - Curtis
> On Mon April 28 2008, David Lawrence wrote:
>   
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>>     This sounds very relevant. The one issue is the time. We have a 
>> total of 1.5 hours to discuss everything regarding offline software. If 
>> we put the talk there, then I think we will need to try and squeeze it 
>> down to no more than 20 minutes total (including questions). The other 
>> option is for you to present this during the beamline section on Friday 
>> afternoon. I'm not sure who's chairing that, but that schedule may also 
>> be tight. What do you think?
>>
>> Regards,
>> -David
>>
>> Richard Jones wrote:
>>     
>>> Dave,
>>>
>>> Yes, I would like to address the question, "What are the beam 
>>> intensity limits coming from detector simulation?"  This question came 
>>> up several times in the context of end-point physics at the PHP 
>>> conference in March.  Part of the answer to this question lies in the 
>>> ultimate rate capabilities of the detector elements, especially the 
>>> forward detectors, and the other part concerns the development of 
>>> specific triggers that are adapted to the specific reactions of 
>>> interest.  As a first step, I will present something on the first 
>>> issue: 20 minutes + 10 for discussion should be sufficient.
>>>
>>> Richard J.
>>>
>>>
>>> David Lawrence wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Hi Richard,
>>>>
>>>>    Is there anything you'd like to present or discuss during the 
>>>> offline software section of the collaboration meeting next week 
>>>> (Thurs. May 8th)?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>>         
>
>
>
>   

-- 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
  David Lawrence Ph.D.
  Staff Scientist                 Office: (757)269-5567   [[[  [   [ [       
  Jefferson Lab                   Pager:  (757)584-5567   [  [ [ [ [ [   
  http://www.jlab.org/~davidl     davidl@jlab.org         [[[  [[ [[ [[[
------------------------------------------------------------------------