Re: BCAL06 note version 1.1

[Blake Leverington <leverinb@uregina.ca>]

Hi Richard,

I would think that since cell 7 and 8 are right next to one another and 
one almost always sees a signal in both cells simultaneously due to the 
beam entering perpendicular to the module that there should be a 
correlation. They aren't really two independent detectors in this 
configuration or so it seems to me.

-Blake

Richard Jones wrote:
> Blake,
>
> That plot is very interesting.  The correlation between the two 
> difference observables is about 80%, which is very high.  I cannot 
> think right away of a mechanism for this strong correlation, can you?  
> The two share the same tagger information, but that should not be 
> dominant enough to explain a 80% corrrelation factor
>
> Richard J.
>
> Blake Leverington wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> Thanks for the comments. I guess I was confused about the sqrt part. 
>> And it would be less confusing for others to just quote a t_tagger 
>> time as opposed to -tphoton. I attached a plot of 
>> (tn8+ts8)/2+tphoton:(tn7+ts7)/2+tphoton. You can see there is a 
>> correlation though I don't think I would call it a strong 
>> correlation. What do you think?
>>
>> -Blake
>>
>