[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Fwd: Re: Collimator layout]



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Collimator layout
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:15:10 -0400
From: Richard Jones <richard.t.jones@uconn.edu>
To: Tim Whitlatch <whitey@jlab.org>
References: <4832F961.7060801@jlab.org> 48341C95.4090207@uconn.edu"><48341C95.4090207@uconn.edu> Pine.LNX.4.58.0805211015260.350@elton01.jlab.org"><Pine.LNX.4.58.0805211015260.350@elton01.jlab.org> Pine.LNX.4.58.0805211017380.21052@jlabl1.jlab.org"><Pine.LNX.4.58.0805211017380.21052@jlabl1.jlab.org> 48344E19.4030305@jlab.org"><48344E19.4030305@jlab.org> 48346B89.6010607@jlab.org"><48346B89.6010607@jlab.org> 483546F0.9070502@uconn.edu"><483546F0.9070502@uconn.edu> 483C7649.2020100@jlab.org"><483C7649.2020100@jlab.org> 


Tim,

I went over your final collimator cave layout.  I agree that it 
accurately reflects our current concept, without the pair spectrometer.  
This can serve as our baseline, that has been simulated and meets our 
requirements.  We will need to make modifications to make room for the 
pair spectrometer, but this is a good starting point.

Richard Jones

begin:vcard
fn:Timothy Whitlatch, PE
n:Whitlatch;Timothy
tel;work:757-269-5087
tel;fax:757-269-5279
version:2.1
end:vcard